1. Labour Court dismissed the petition of the appellant: It is clear from section 17 (1-A) that the order of termination is to be passed by the Authority himself. Authority means the Chairman and the Members. The copy of the order of termination brought on the record does not show if the order was passed by the Chairman and the Members after considering the case of the appellant. In the order it is mentioned that the Authority has terminated the service which means that the Authority has passed a separate order. Copy of the said order passed by the Authority should have been brought on the record. If it had been done it could be seen whether the order had been passed according to the provisions of section 17 (1-A). Needless to say that only the order cannot be challenged in, a court which has been legally passed under section 17 (1-A). So unless he Court is satisfied that the order has been legally passed the jurisdiction of Court is not barred.
2. As a result of the observations made above, I accept the appeal and setting aside the order of the learned lower Court remained the case' with direction that the original or certified copy of the order passed by the Authority should be perused to see whether it has been passed according to the provisions of sections 17 (1-A), The respondent is directed to produce the original or certified copy of the order by the learned lower Court. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.