SYED HASAN AZHAR RIZVI, J.---Through this petition under section 279 read with sections 280 to 283 and 285(8) of the Companies Act, 2017, the petitioners which are public/private companies limited by shares incorporated and existing under the Companies Ordinance/Act have sought permission of this Court for sanction of 'Scheme of Arrangement' as set forth in Annexure 'D' at page-65 to the petition.
2. The object of this petition is to, inter alia, obtain sanction of this Court to the Scheme of Arrangement in terms of which:-
(i) specific portions of the undertaking of the Petitioner No.1 i.e. the ICPL Dem erged Undertaking 1 and ICPL Demerged Undertaking 2, as more particularly described in the Scheme of Arrang ement, will be demerged from- the Petitioner No. I and shall be transfe rred to, stand vested in and assumed by the Petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 respectively , while the ICPL Retained Undertaking (as defined in the Scheme of Arrangement) shall continue to remain with the Petitioner No.1 (which shall continue as a going concern);
(ii) simultaneously , specific portions of the undertaking of the Petitioner No. 2 i.e. the DPL Demerged Undertaking, as more particularly described in the Scheme of Arrangement, will be demerged from the Petitioner No. 2 and shall be transferred to, stand vested in and assumed by the Petitioner No I, while the DPL Retained Undertaking (as defined in the Scheme of Arrangement) shall continue to remain with the Petitioner No. 2 (which shall continue as a going concern);
(iii) simultaneously , specific portions of the undertaking of the Petitioner No 3 i.e. the AFPL Demerged Undertaking 1 and AFPL Demerged Undertaking 2, as more particularly described in the Scheme of Arrangement, will be demerged from the Petitioner No. 3 and shall be transferred to stand vested in and assumed by the Petitioners Nos. 1 and 2 respectively , while the AFPL Retained Undertaking (as defined in the Scheme of Arrangement) shall continue to remain with the Petitioner No. 3 (which shall continue as a going concern).
Furthermore, (a) the ICPL Retained Undertaking (as defined in the Scheme of Arrangement) shall continue to remain with the Petitioner No. 1 (taking into account the merger/amalgamation of the DPL Demerged Undertaking and AFPL Demerged Undertaking 1 with and into the Petitioner No 1); (b) the DPI, Retained Undertaking (as defined in the Scheme of Arrangement) shall continue to remain with the Petitioner No. 2 (taking into account the merger/amalgamation of the ICPL Demerged Undertaking 1 and AFPL Demerged Undertaking 2 with and into the Petitioner No 2): and (c)"the AFPL Retained Undertaking (as defined in the Scheme of Arrangement) shall continue to remain with the Petitioner No. 3 (taking into account the merger/amalgamation of the ICPL Demerged Undertaking 2 with and into the Petitioner No. 3).
Additionally , the Petitioners seek the confirmation of this Hon'ble Court with respect to the reduction in the shareholders' equity of the each of the Petitioners, as consequence of the demergers/arrangements including, in particular , (i) the reduction in the issued and paid up share capital of the Petitioner No. 2; and (ii) the reduction in the issued and paid up share capital of the Petitioner No. 3.
3. Pursuant to order dated 27.05.2021 notice of this petition to consider scheme of arrangement proposed between the petitioners in terms of Rule 76 read with Rule 19 of the Companies Ordinance (Court) Rules, 1997 was issued.
Notice was also issued to the Registrar , Joint Stock Companies. Publication was also effected in daily 'Jang' (Urdu) and daily 'The News' (English), Karachi dated 14.06.2021, so also in the official Gazette of Pakistan dated 04.08.2021.
4. In terms of the order dated 27.05.2021 separate meetings of the members/shareholders and secured creditors of the Petitioners Nos.1 and 2 as well as the members/shareholders of the petitioner No.3 were convened on 26.07.2021. In the meetings of the Petitioners resolutions as described in para-3 of all the reports of the Chairman were passed (reports are available at pages-27, 53, 81, 103 and 127) and the members/shareholders of the petitioners voted in favour of their respective resolution thus all were represented one hundred percent (100%) in value of the shares held by the members present in person or by proxy and voted at the meetings whereas in respect of secured creditors of the petitioners Nos.1 and 2 one hundred percent (100%) of the value of creditors of petitioners Nos.1 and 2 present and voting at the meeting have consented to and passed the resolution approving the Scheme of Arraignment and no secured creditor of the petitioners Nos.1 and 2 has objected to the said scheme.
5. Parawise comments by the Syed Iftikhar Ul Hasan Naqvi, Additional Registra r of Companies, Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, were filed on 23.08.2021, wherein certain formal observations are made which are not against and inconsequential to the Scheme of Arrangement.
6. In view of the above circumstances, I am of the opinion that all the indispensable statutory benchmarks and formalities have been accomplished and adhered to by the petitioners as envisioned under the relevant provisions of Companies Act, 2017 and the enabling rules. The Scheme set up for sanction have been reinforced and fortified by the requisite majority which decision seems to be just and fair. The report of Chairman, unequivocally convey that all essential and fundamental characteristics and attributes of scheme were placed before the voters in the separate meetings to live up to statutory obligations. The proposed scheme as a whole looks like evenhanded and serviceable from the point of view of prudent men of business, taking a commercial decision. Once the requirements of a scheme for getting sanction of the court are found to have been met, the court will have no further jurisdiction to sit over the commercial wisdom of the majority of the class of persons who with their open eyes have given their approval to the scheme.
7. There is no material on record to suggest that the scheme of arrangement would be against public interest or in violation of any law. The petition is, therefore, allowed as prayed for and 'Scheme of Arrangement' (Annexure "D' at page-65 to the Petition) is sanctioned. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.