Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2022 SCMR 1066, PLJ 2022 SC (Cr.C.) 210, 2022 PSC (Crl.) 671

Dilawar Ali vs The State and others

Citation2022 SCMR 1066, PLJ 2022 SC (Cr.C.) 210, 2022 PSC (Crl.) 671
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Petition No. 1268-L of 2021
Date2022-01-27
Judge(s)Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Umar Ata Bandial
ResultBail refused

ORDER

QAZI M UHAM M AD AM IN AHM ED, J. Declined downstairs throughout, lastly by a learned Judge-in- Chamber of the Lahore High Court. Lahore, vide impugned order dated 18.07.2021, Dilawar Ali, petitioner herein, blamed to have strangulated his better half Muqaddas Bibi, survived by an infant daughter of 9 month, to death, seeks leave to appeal therefrom for admission to post arrest bail.

The deceased, often complained maltreatment and shared agony with her parents, however, she was advised to exercise restraint to save the bond, a hope that withered away on the fateful day.

Petitioner attempted to hush up the death as suicidal, an hypothesis seemingly contradicted by the autopsy report.

2. Heard. Record perused.

3. With an infant baby girl of 9 months, it is rather hard to entertain hypothesis of suicide by a feeding mother. Medical Office noted a ligature mark around the neck seemingly a complete scar, circumference the neck between both ears; it is thick and hard with parchment, without there being any obliquity, that inevitably occurs in a case of voluntary suicide on account of sudden fall through gravitational pull. External as well as internal petechial hemorrhage unmistakably suggest application of manual compression, a sign diametrically inconsistent with the plea of suicide, further confirmed by an intact hyoid bone.

Instead of taking the police on board, petitioner preferred to avail remedy of ad interim pre-arrest bail, a protection hardly available to him under the law, however, finally recalled on 29.10.2020 and it is thereafter that he came up with the plea of suicide, a circumstance nugatory in itself. Joint abode of the spouses is a common ground and, thus, a statutory burden within the contemplation of Article 122 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 is cast upon the petitioner to explain as to what befell upon his wife who spent- the preceding night with him under the same roof; his failure to vindicate his position is further aggravated by the statements of witnesses, suggesting an ongoing acrimony between the spouses and thus, constitutes "reasonable grounds" within the contemplation of section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. View concurrently taken on the basis of aforementioned material, being within the remit of law, is not open to any legitimate exception. Petition fails. Leave declined.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch