Pakistan Case Law← Search
2021 SCMR 1210, 2021 PSC CRI 24, KLR 2021 Supreme Court Cases 87, PLJ 2022

Shahid Shafiq Alam Faridi and another vs Federation of Pakistan, etc

Citation2021 SCMR 1210, 2021 PSC CRI 24, KLR 2021 Supreme Court Cases 87, PLJ 2022
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petitions No. 920-1, and 2067 of 2020
Date2020-11-25
Judge(s)Mushir Alam, Sardar Tariq Masood, Yahya Afridi
ResultBail granted

ORDER

YAHYA AFRIDI, J.---- Through these petitions, Shahid Shafiq Alam Faridi and Ahad Khan Cheema (the petitioners) have sought leave to appeal against the order dated 13.04.2020 passed b) a learned Division Bench or the Lahore High Court. Lahore in Writ Petitions No. 35056 of 2019 and 11006 of 2020, whereb y post-arrest bail was refused to them in Reference No. 50 of 2018 ("Reference ") filed by the National Accountability Bureau ("NAB ") before the Accountability Court V, Lahore ("Accountability Court ") under section 18(g) read with section 24(b) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 (" Ordinance ").

2. Arguments of the worthy counsel for the parties have been heard and record perused.

3. Lest this Court passes any finding on the role of the petitioners in the crime, which may prejudice the case of the parties during the on-going trial before the Accountability Court, suffice it to state that a co-accused in the Reference, namely Bilal Kidwai who was behind bars for a much shorter period than the petitioners, has been granted bail by this Court, on the groun d of "his prolonged and continued incarceration of the petitioner to be unconscionable" . We are informed that since the said decision of this Court, and strict directions of the Lahore High Court to conclude the trial expeditiously , only three more prosecution witnesses have recorded their statements, and seventy-five witnesses still remain to be produced to record their evidence. Moreover , we have also examined the order-sheets of the Court proceedings before the Accountability Court, and note that the responsibility of the delay in the trial, proceedings, cannot be entirely saddled upon the petitioners. This being so, to keep the petitioners incarcerated in the present case, when a co-accused in the Reference having remained behind bars for a much shorter period had been granted bail on the ground of "unconscionable delay", would not only be legally inappropriate, but would in fact be outrightly unjust. Thus, following the principle of consistency , we1 find that a case for the grant of post-arrest bail is made out in favour of the petitioners, on the ground of "unconscionable delay" as elaborately explained by this Court in Tallat Ishaq's case .

4. For the reasons stated, hereinabove, these petitions are converted into appeals and the same are allowed and consequently Shahid Shafiq Alam Faridi and Ahad Khan Cheema, the petitioners are admitted to bail in Reference No. 50 of 2018 subject to furnishing bail {{Foot Note}} 1 Civil Petition No. 3473 of 2018 dated 03.12.2019.

2 Tallat lshag vs. National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman, etc. ( PLD 2019 SC 1 12) {{Foot Note}} bond in the sum of Rs. 1,000,000/- (Rupees one million only) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Accountability Court V, Lahore. It is made clear that the petitioners shall not leave the country or be allowed to leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search