Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2021 SHC 1292

Naeem Ahmed Gopang vs The State and others

Citation2021 SHC 1292
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Crl.Transfer Appln.No.S-67 of 2020
Date2021-12-16
Judge(s)Irshad Ali Shah
ResultApplication dismissed

ORDER

1. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant and his witnesses are apprehending danger to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who oftently are threatening them to be killed, if they would attend learned trial Court at Qamber , therefore, his case to be transferred to any of the Court of competent jurisdiction at Karachi.

2. Learned Addl.P .G for the State and learned counsel for the private respondents have sought for dismissal of the instant transfer application by contending that the applicant is defeating early dispo sal of the case for one or other reason.

3. I have considered the above arguments and perused the record.

4. Significantly , nothing has been brought on record which may suggest that as to when, where and in what fashion, the applicant and his witnesses were threatened by the private respondents to be killed, if they would attend learned trial Court at Qamber . No witness has come forward to say that he actual ly was threatened by the private respondents to be killed, if he would attend learned trial Court. No criminal case could be transferred from one to other Court on the basis of self invented grounds. Consequently , the instant Crl.T ransfer application is dismissed alongwith listed application.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch