Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLJ 2021 Cr.C. 919, PLJ 2021 Cr.C. (Lahore) 391

Muhammad Arif and 2 others vs State and another

CitationPLJ 2021 Cr.C. 919, PLJ 2021 Cr.C. (Lahore) 391
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Crl. Misc. No. 39150-B of 2020
Date2020-10-13
Judge(s)Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad
ResultPetition allowed

ORDER

Muhammad Arif, Ijaz Ahmad and Husnai n petitioners have prayed for pre-arrest bail in case FIR No. 339 dated 05.07.2020. registered at Police Station Satrah District Sialkot for the offences under Sections 452, 447, 354, 148, 149, PPC.

2. Arguments heard and record perused.

3. FIR was registered on the complaint made by Mst. Salma Bibi, who alleged that petitioners along with thirteen co-accused named in FIR and five unknown persons trespassed into her house, beaten the inmates, outraged modesty of complainant and others women and forcibly possessed over the house Stance of learned counsel for petitioners is that the house in question was purchased by petitioners from complainant's father and they were already in possession thereof. Admittedly , Muhammd Iqbal co-accused has instituted a suit for declaration or in alternate for specific performance of contract against Ghulam Haider , father of the complainant qua disputed house. A suit for declaration qua the house in question has also been filed by complainant against her father and others. Both the suits are pending adjudication. FIR was registered after eight days of the alleged occurrence. Such delay has not been explained in the FIR. Both the parties claim complainant against her father and others. Both the suits are pending adjudication. FIR was registered after eight days of the alleged occurrence. Such delay has not been explained in the FIR. Both the parties claim their possession on the disputed land. In such backdrop, actual facts of the case can be surfaced after recording evidence at trial. Petitioners have already joined investigation. No useful purpose would be served by handing over petitioners, custody to police at this stage. Therefore, petition in hand is allowed and ad-interim pre-arrest bail already granted to each of the petitioners is confirmed subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch