This is the 4th petition on the subject, on behalf of the petitioner . One of the earlier ones, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6595-B of 2016, was dismissed as withdrawn after having been argued at length on 07.06.2016, the other one, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 8788-B of 2016, was also dismissed as withdrawn on 30.06.2016, but without any arguments thereon, whereas, the last one, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 10026-B of 2016, was dismissed on merits, vide order dated 04.08.2016.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to hint at any fresh ground, except for the fact that two recovery witnesses had not supported the prosecu tion case and he repetitiously insisted that the petition in hand may be decided on merits. It must be known by the learned counsel that two of the earlier petitions had been decided on merits and he needed a fresh ground to render this petition meaningfully sustainable, which was virtually non- existent hereirr as evidence of two hostile formal prosecution witnesses generated no fresh ground in favour of the petitioner . Guidance in this regard may be had from "The State through Advocate General, N. W.F.P. v. Zubair and 4 others" reported as PLD 1986 SC 173, Muhammad Siddique v. The State and another (2014 SCMR 304), Nazir Ahmad and another v. The State and others (PLD 2014 SC 241) and Ghulam Qammber Shah v.
Mukhtiar Hussain and others (PLD 2015 SC 66). Sans existence of any fresh ground, this petition is dismissed in limine. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.