Sole grievance of the petitioner is that his name was not included in the merit list prepared after the written test for 13 posts of Naib Qasid. He additionally submits that paper of the petitioner was not even marked by the concerned authorities as the same was misplaced by the respondent.
2. On the other hand Superintendent of District Judiciary submits that on the application of the petitioner , paper of the petitioner was traced from the record and has been duly marked by the concerned authority . The petitioner has secured 32 marks out of 40 while the merit was fixed at 34 marks. The written paper of the petitioner has been brought to the Court and shown to the petitioner , who acknowledged it to be his paper . As the petitioner secured less marks, he did not meet the threshold qualification of 34 marks and was not called for the interview .
3. There is no merit in the instant petition, which is, therefore, dismissed.