Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2021 MLD 1503, 2021 PHC 34

Jawad Khan alias Sohail vs The State

Citation2021 MLD 1503, 2021 PHC 34
CourtPeshawar High Court
Case No.Bail Petition No.2967-P/2020
Date2021-02-08
Judge(s)Qaiser Rashid Khan
ResultPetition dismissed

ORDER

QAISER RASHID KHAN, CJ. Accused-petitioner Jawad Khan alias Sohail seeks his release on bail in case FIR No.81, dated 18.09.2015, under Sections 302/324/353/427/148/149/120-B PPC / 3/4 & 5 Explosive Substances Act / 15-AA read with section 7 ATA of Police Station CTD, District Peshawar with the allegations that he along with his co-accused are involved in the attack at PAF Camp Badhber , wherein, 29 persons including the officers and solders of Pakistan Army and Pakistan Air Force embraced Shahadat and 39 others sustained injuries.

2. Arguments heard and the available record perused.

3. As per the FIR, it was the complainant Flight Lieutenant Hussain Muhammad, who reported about the incident as to how nineteen / twenty terrorists forcibly entered the PAF Camp Badhber , Peshawar on 18.09.2015 and caused huge casualties and damage to the property . Initially , the FIR was lodged against the unknown culprits. However , during the investigation, when the co-accused Mst. Zari Zadgai was arrested, she in turn recorded her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. wherein, she gave a detailed account in respect of the mode and manner of the occurrence including the active role / participation of the accused-petitioner in the commission of the of fence.

4. The argument hard pressed by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner is that while the co-accused Mst.

Zari Zadgai has named one Sohail to have participated in the commission of the offence along with his co-accused, the name of the accused-petitioner is Jawad Khan and as such, he has got no nexus with the occurrence. The common feature of such like cases is that the report is always lodged against unknown culprits. However , it is during the course of investigation when they are identified through various sources as they have either their real names or fake names and at times are known through their aliases. They are thus charged in the FIRs through the supplementary statement recorded by the complainant party . In the instant case too, the accused-petitioner has been introduced by the co-accused Mst. Zari Zadgai in her statement recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C through his alias, i.e. Sohail.

5. Apart from above, the accused-petition er instead of surrendering himself prefe rred to stay in abscondance for over four and a half years and surrendered only after the acquittal of his co-accused Mst. Zari Zadgai. Thus, taking a tentative assessment of the availab le record, the accused-petitioner is prima facie connected with the commission of the offence which is both serious and heinous and also falls within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 Cr .P.C. Accordingly , I hold him disentitled to the concession of bail.

6. Accordingly , this bail petition is dismissed.

7. Needless to mention that the observations recorded in this order are purely tentative in nature and shall not prejudice the proceedings before the learned trial court where the case be decided on its own merits after recording evidence.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch