ABDULLAH BALOCH, J.----This transfer application has been filed by the applicants (plaintif fs) for transfer of Civil Suit No.72 of 2018 pending before the learned Senior Civil Judge Loralai ("trial Court"), which was filed by the applicants (plaintif fs) against the respondents (defendants) for declaration and perm anent injunction, seeking share of inherited property of their mother left by their late maternal grandfather , which is in the possession of respondents (defendants) on the sole ground that after institution of civil suit the respondents (defendants) have become inimical towards the applicants (plaintif fs) and on 5th December 2019 when the applicants. (plaintif fs) proceeded to appear before the trial Court and stayed in the house of their maternal Aunt namely Bibi Zaida (respondent No.18), the respondents (defendants) launched attacked upon their maternal aunt in order to cause them hurt and to harass and blackmail the applicants (plaintif fs) to withdraw from their legal rights and also extended threats of dire consequences to the applicants (plaintif fs), thus in such circumstances there is an apprehension that if the case is not transferred from the trial Court to somewhere else, the respondents(defendants) might launch a deadly attack upon the applicants (plainti ffs) while travelling or appearing before the trial Court.
2. Pre-admission notices were issued to all the respondents, who made their appearance and arguments were heard.
3. After hearing arguments and perusing the record, it appears that in the year 2018 the applicants (plaintif fs) filed a suit for declaration, possession, mense profit and permanent injunction against the respondents (defendants) in the Court of Senior Civil Judge Loralai, seeking the relief of their share from the inherited properties left by their maternal grandfather . The suit was contested by the respondents (defendants) by means of filing written statements and the matter is still pending for recording the evidence of parties and till date the proceedings are under way before the trial Court. It is mainly contended by the applicants (plaintif fs) that the respondents (defendants) after institution of the said suit have become inimical towards the plaintif fs and on 5th December 2019 attacked upon the maternal Aunt of the applicants (plaintif fs) to cause hurt to the applicant (plaintif fs). In this regard the perusal of record further reveals that against the said incident dated 5th December 2019, an FIR No.243 of 2019 was lodged by one Shams-ud-Din, who though is not party to the suit, but however , claimed to be the son of victim Bibi Zaida (respondent No.18) against the private respondents under Section 337-A Q&D read with sections 452, 354, 504, 506(2) and 34, P .P.C. at Police Station Saddar Loralai.
4. It is also observed that the learned counsel for applicant(plaintif fs) made an attempt to tag that criminal incident with civil litigation and to base the same for transfer of the civil case to another place just to create trouble and inconvenience for the respondents (defendants), which prima-facie seems to be creation of mala fide intention, as the transfer of case from the Loralai to somewhere else will create inconvenience for both the parties and their witnesses. Even otherwise, parties are close to each other and also residing in the same city and there is no history of their previous enmity , thus a minor incident cannot be based for transfer of the case for which FIR has already been lodged and law is taken into motio n. The learned counsel for applicants (plaintif fs) has failed to bring on record any sufficient cause for transfer of the case from the trial Court to somewhere, else. It also appears from the record that the learned counsel for the applicants is also one of the plaintif fs, as such, in civil litigation he can make an alternate arrangement of an Advocate to proceed with their case. If at all the contents of FIR are taken into consideration even then the incident had taken place in between the respondents and taking the advantage of the same the applicants (plaintif fs) have joine d hands with the respondent No.18 to avail the sympathizes of her in their favour , but it may be clarified that parties cannot be allowed to seek transfer of the case from one Court to another without showing sufficient cause or in absence of any valid ground, such practice tend to frustrate and cause delay in lawful proceedings pending before the Court of competent jurisdiction and also cause inconvenience to the other party . In the instant case, the applicants have failed to show any reasonable cause and has also not raised any valid ground for seeking transfer of the case from the trial Court, which is the requirement of section 24, C.P .C.
For the above reasons, the application is hereby rejected, with no orders as to costs.