Pakistan Case Law← Search
2020 SHC 902

Yar Mohammad son of Ghulam Hussain vs Province Of Sindh & Others

Citation2020 SHC 902
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.C.P No.D-1264 of 2012
Date2020-11-03
Judge(s)Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Irshad Ali Shah
ResultApplication dismissed

ORDER

Irshad Ali Shah J. The petitioner by way of instant petition prayed for the following reliefs:

(a) To declare that the inaction on the part of the official respondents in the matter , thereby failing to provide proper healthy hygienic premises and implementation of the law in letter and spirit amounts to failure in discharge of their responsibility and ensure protection to the person and life of the people.

(b) To direct the respondents to ensure the proper and full loading/unloading of Food Grain trucks at official Godoowns only and pay compensation to victim and their families.

(c) To direct the respondents to keep the area of the Godoowns under strict surveillance and ensure compliance of the directions, if any given by this Hon'ble Court or the recommendations if any by some expert.

(d) To initiate Judicial Inquiry into the deaths and accidents of workers of respondents for criminal negligence.

(e) To direct the respondents that all provisions of law according to various statutes may be complied with.

(f) To award cost of petition.

(g) To grant any other relief as deemed fit and proper and in the interest of justice.

2. The instant petition on account of continuous absence of the petitioner and his counsel, without intimation was dismissed by this Court on 02.10.2019. The restoration of the instant petition now is being sought for by the petitioner by making the listed application. It is filed on 14.09.2020. The limitation for restoration of the petitions dismissed in like nature is thirty days as is prescribed by Article-163 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Neither any application for condonation of such belated delay is filed nor any sufficient cause is shown / advanced by the petitioner , which may justify restoring the instant petition to its original side at the cost of precious time of the Court.

3. Above are the reasons of short order dated 03.1 1.2020 whereby the listed application was dismissed.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search