1. ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, J. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the record we have observed that the occurrence in this case had taken place in daylight and an FIR in respect of the same had been lodged with reasonable promptitude wherein the present petitioner had specifically been named as the principal accused and effective firing at Majeed Khan deceased as well as ineffective firing at Sajjad Gul complainant had been attributed to him therein. It is not disputed that the eye-witnesses mentioned in the FIR have so far stood by their statements made before the police fully incriminating the petitioner and also that prima facie the medical evidence lends support to the ocular account in respect of the role attributed to the petitioner .
2. Apparently the petitioner was connected with the motive set up in the FIR and during the investigation a pistol had been recovered from his custody which firearm had matched with two crime-empties secured from the place of occurrence and also with a bullet recovered from the dead body of Majeed Khan deceased. According to the record the petitioner had remained a fugitive for three long years before he was arrested in connection with this case. The petitioner's trial has already commenced. In view of all these factors available on the record prima facie reasonable grounds exist to believe in the petitioner's involvement in the alleged offences. This petition is, therefore, dismissed and leave to appeal is refused. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.