ABDUL HAMEED BALOCH, J.---This Criminal Transfer Application has been preferred by the applicant/accused Noor Muhammad, seeking transfer of the case FIR No.27/2011, registered with Police Station Sinjavi from the file of learned Sessions Judge, Loralai to any other court of competent jurisdiction in Quetta.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 04.11.2011 complainant Haji Abdul Hameed lodged an FIR No. 27/2011 with Police Station Sinjavi, alleging therein that on the stated date on receipt of information that his son Abdul Qayum was beaten and taken to hospital, he rushed to the hospital and found his son lying dead in the pool of blood. Tariq son of Abdul Shakoor told him that after offering the prayer of Jumma he and Abdul Qayum after taking tea were going to home on motorcycle, when they reached near Haji Peer Muhammad shop, where they found accused persons namely Baz Muhammad, Raz Muhammad and Haji Noor Muhammad. Accused Raz Muhammad started firing upon them whereas Haji Noor Muhammad attacked upon Abdul Qayum on his head by means of Churri and accused Baz Muhammad on his chest by means of Churn i, due to which Abdul Qayum sustained serious injuries and fell down on earth, whilst the accused person boarded in black surf vehicle and a white 2-D Car and made their escape good from the scene, while Abdul. Qayyum succumbed to injuries in the way to hospital.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant being law abiding citizen has surrendered himself before the trial court, wherefrom he has been admitted to pre-arrest bail which was later on confirmed; that being a political entity and a sitting minister of Balochistan Provincial Assembly, serious threats for dire consequences have been extended to the applicant from complainant, on the basis whereof the instant case may kindly be transferred from Sessions Judge Loralai to any other Court at Quetta.
4. Learned APG also opposed the transfer application and urged for dismissal of the application.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the record of the case. The perusal of record reveals that the applicant is sitting minister of Government of Balochistan.
Admittedly the complainant is not holding any such position. The security and liberty of the citizen is sole responsibility of the Government The government is responsible for the security of his minister. It is astonishing when the government cannot provide security to the minister then how will he fulfill his responsibility in respect of general public. It is admitted fact that the transfer of case cannot be claimed as a matter of routine or at the wish of the parties unless it is apparent at the face of record that parties seeking the transfer cannot get fair and just treatment or trial. The applicant has alleged the threatening messages from the complainant side but has not produced copies of the messages or report from the concerned quarter, mere mentioning the threatening messages in the memo of appeal without cogent reasons cannot be considered. The applicant has not produced any convincing material nor mentioned such authority to which he approached to lodge the complaint.
Simply on apprehension of the applicant for danger to his life a murder case cannot be transferred. Thus, the reason given by the applicant for his security has no sanctity. It is by now well settled law that a case should not be transferred from the court of competent jurisdiction unless the allegations/ground seeking transfer of the case are supported by strong cogent reasons or convincing evidence. Reliance is placed on the case of Altaf Hussain v. State PLD 2014 Sindh 287.
In view of above, the learned counsel for the applicant has failed to point out any cogent reason or convincing evidence, as such the application being devoid of merits is dismissed accordingly.