Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2020 MLD 1130

Mujeeb Ullah and 2 others vs The State

Citation2020 MLD 1130
CourtGilgit Baltistan Chief Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No. 32 of 2020
Date2020-02-11
Judge(s)Ali Baig
ResultBail granted

ORDER

ALI BAIG, J.---Through the instant bail petition filed under section 497, Cr.P.C., the petitioners have sought post arrest bail in case FIR No.15/2017 dated 27.5.2017 registered under sections 368, 365-B/34, P.P.C. at Police Station City Astore.

2. It may be mentioned here that earlier the petitioners had filed bail petition in the Court of learned Judge Anti- Terrorism Court No.1 Gilgit, which was dismissed by the learned trial court vide bail order dated 28-01-2018.

Hence, this petition.

3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners/ accused contended that the petitioners/accused are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case with mala fide intention by the local police. The learned counsel for the petitioners/accused further argued that principal accused namely Tahir Iqbal and others co-accused of the petitioners have been granted post arrest bail by this court, hence rule of consistency applies to the case of the present petitioners/accused and as such, the petitioners are also entitled for concession of bail.

4. Conversely, the learned Dy. AG vehemently opposed this petition by contending that soon after the occurrence the petitioners/ accused were absconded, therefore, the petitioners/accused are not entitled for concession of post arrest bail.

5. I have heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Dy.AG and perused the record with their able assistance.

6. From perusal of contents of FIR it transpires that the present petitioners/accused were not directly charged in the FIR rather FIR was lodged against unknown culprits/ persons. Moreover, principal accused namely Tahir Iqbal and his co-accused have been released on bail by this court vide bail order dated 02-02-2018,hence rule of consistency applies to the case of the petitioners/accused as identical role has been attributed to all the co- accused who have already been granted bail by this court and the present petitioners/accused are also entitled for concession of bail.

7. Furthermore, the complainant has entered into compromise with the principal accused namely Tahir Iqbal and bail cannot be refused on the ground that the petitioners were absconded soon after the occurrence.

10(sic). For what has been discussed above, this petition is allowed and the petitioners are admitted to post arrest bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.300,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial court. File.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch