MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN, J.-A shop in building No. S-64-R-10 Anarkali, Lahore is in occupation of Ahmed Saeed respondent, as a tenant. He is said to have constructed two walls and a roof of corrugated sheets in it closing the rear door of the shop and the passage to the rear doors of other shops. The petitioner consequently moved an application under section 13 of the Rent Restriction Ordinance for his ejectment for having made construc--tion, which impaired the usefulness of the property rented out to him. This application was rejected on 14-3-1966. An appeal filed against it was rejected by the Additional District Judge on 17-11-1966 and S. A. O. No. 38 of 1967 met the same fate in the Lahore High Court on 26-2-1975. Hence this civil petition for special leave to appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the construction, had, in fact, impaired the value of the property and that damage had bee caused to it. There is a concurrent finding of fact of the three Courts below that this contention is not sustainable by the facts brought on the record, In fact the High Court has come to the conclusion that the construction has been made on a portion of the street and not the property itself and that there is no proof that any damage has been caused to the property or to its utility.
3. These are pure questions of fact and this Court does not go into them particularly when the three Courts below have agreed. The petition is, there--fore, dismissed and leave to appeal is refused. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.