Pakistan Case Law← Search
2020 SCMR 1063

Allah Rakha vs The State through P.G. Punjab and another

Citation2020 SCMR 1063
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Petition No. 120 of 2020
Date2020-05-07
Judge(s)Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, Umar Ata Bandial
ResultPetition dismissed

ORDER

QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.---Petitioner was detached as Civil Nazir with the learned Senior Civil Judge Sialkot; during routine audit, he was found to have misappropriated various amounts deposited under different heads, calculated as Rs.36,00,000/; confronted with his misconduct, he deposited back a sum of Rs.7,00,000/-, with undertaking to clear the remainder of liability, a commitment that remained unfulfilled. After preliminary inquiry, he was sent to face trial before the learned Special Judge Anti-Corruption (Provincial)

Gujranwala; vide judgment dated 16.5.2018, he was returned a guilty verdict, in consequence whereof, he was convicted and sentenced as below:- "Under section 409, P.P.C., 10-years' RI with fine of Rs.5,00,000/- Under section 420, P.P.C., 5-years' RI with fine of Rs.5,00,000/- Under section 468, P.P.C., 5-years' RI with fine of Rs.5,00,000/- Under section 471, P.P.C., 5-years' RI with fine of Rs.5,00,000/- Under section 5(2)C, P.C.A., 5-years' RI with fine of Rs.5,00,000/- In case of default of payment of fine, he shall further undergo six months' SI for each offence; sentences shall run concurrently with benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C.."

Petitioner's appeal met with no better fate in the High Court vide impugned judgment dated 18.11.2019, vires whereof, have been assailed on a variety of grounds, however, upon reconsideration, the learned counsel has prayed for reduction of sentence recorded under section 409 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 from ten years to five years, a quantum equivalent to coordinate charges.

2. We have thoughtfully considered the alternate submission. The petitioner has been facing the consequences of his misconduct since the year 2015; he deposited back a sum of Rs.700,000/- and failed to clear the remainder liability on account of his obvious financial incapacity; he has been dismissed from the service. The learned trial Judge considered a period of five years as appropriate sentence on coordinate charges, however, awarded maximum sentence provided for an offence under section 409 of the Code ibid. Although the petitioner being a part of system of administration of justice was certainly under a heavier onus to maintain highest standard of integrity and rectitude, nonetheless, his indiscretion has not brought him anything other than an abiding stigma and loss of post retirement comforts, therefore, in the above backdrop, reduction of sentence recorded on the said count to five years' RI would be a wage, conscionable in circumstances. The petition is dismissed, however, the sentence is accordingly reduced to run concurrently with coordinate charges, pre-trial period inclusive.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only β€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerΒ·PrivacyΒ·TermsΒ·Search