Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLJ 2019 Cr.C. 61

ZULFIQAR ALI vs STATE, etc

CitationPLJ 2019 Cr.C. 61
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Crl. Misc. No, 127219-B of 2017
Date2018-03-09
Judge(s)Tariq Saleem Sheikh
ResultBail accepted

ORDER

The Petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No, 246/2017 dated 03-06-2017 that was registered against him at Police Station City Phool Nagar, District Kasur, for an offence under Section 376, PPC.

2. Briefly, the prosecution case is that the Petitioner is the real brother of the Complainant. He is issueless and adopted Complainant's daughter Zainab Bibi aged 13 years. On 31-05-2017 when Zainab Bibi came to the Complainant's house she informed him that the Petitioner had been repeatedly committing rape with her.

3. I have heard the learned counsel and have perused the record. It is observed that the FIR was lodged with a delay of three days and victim Zainab Bibi was medically examined after another two days. The prosecution has not furnished any explanation for these delays. The statement that the victim made before the lady doctor while giving her case history is more intriguing. She stated that she was seven years old when the Petitioner raped her many times. She told her mother about that but she ignored it. Then, three months prior to the registration of the FIR he took her again to his house and raped her. As a result, she conceived whereupon the Petitioner gave her medicine to make her miscarry on 7-5-2017. The Medico-Legal Certificate does not corroborate her allegation that she became pregnant and was made to abort. The aforesaid statement of Zainab Bibi is also in conflict with the prosecution version as set out in the FIR. Moreover, the DNA test report does not connect the Petitioner with the alleged offence as the vaginal swabs of the victim did not contain any seminal material which could be compared with the DNA profile of the Petitioner. All these circumstances call for further inquiry within the meaning of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C. to determine his guilt.

4. The Petitioner is behind the bars since 07-06-2017. He has joined the investigation and is not required by the police for any further probe. Since his trial is not likely to be concluded in the near future, he cannot be incarcerated for an indefinite period.

5. In view of the foregoing, I am inclined to accept this application and admit the Petitioner to post- arrest bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 100,000/- (Rupees one hundred thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch