Pakistan Case Law← Search
1982 PLC 574

PAKISTAN, ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL CONSTRUCTORS LTD. vs MEMBER

Citation1982 PLC 574
CourtSindh High Court
Judge(s)Ajmal Mian
ResultOrder accordingly

' In this petition the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs - "(a) declaring that the said order dated 10th February, 1981 passed by the Respondent No, 1 is without lawful authority and of no legal effect ;

(b) making such order of further declarations and giving such order or further directions as may appear to this Hon'ble Court to be just and proper in the circumstances of the case."

2. It is an admitted position that on 4th June, 1979 through a Notification issued by the Federal Government of Pakistan under the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952 declared all classes of employment in connection with the generation, transmission, distribution of supply of electricity to be employment to which the said Act was made applicable. In view of the case of Karachi Electric Supply Corporation Limited v. National Industrial Relations Commission (1), it has been settled that respondent No, 1 has no power to adjudicate upon individual grievances and that an aggrieved party can resort to the , provisions of the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance)

Act, 1952. I " this view of the matter of the impugned order cannot be sustained. However, Mr. Khurshid Anwar Shaikh, learned counsel for the respondent No, 2, contends that since the impugned order was passed at Lahore the writ petition should have been filed in the Lahore High Court instead of filing in the Sind High Court. In overview since the Chairman of the N. I. R. C. Acts as the Specified Authority under the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952, throughout Pakistan, he can be sued even at Karachi. Even otherwise the above objection is highly technical which cannot be sustained in view of the clear pronouncement of the Supreme Court as to the jurisdiction of respondent No, 1.

3. For the aforesaid reasons, we allow the petition and declare that the impugned order is without lawful authority and of no legal effect. The respondents are restrained from acting upon the same. {{FOOT NOTE}}

(1) PLD 1982 SC 113 {{FOOT NOTE}}

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search