Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2018 MLD 1185

MUHAMMAD AQEEL vs The STATE through FIA

Citation2018 MLD 1185
CourtGilgit Baltistan Chief Court
Case No.Cr. Rev. No.10 of 2016
Date2016-08-26
Judge(s)Malik Haq Nawaz
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

MALIK HAQ NAWAZ, J.---The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is facing charges under section 409, P.P.C. and section 5(2) PCA-1947 on the basis of FIR No. 02/2015 of Police Station FIA Gilgit.

2. The petitioner was allowed bail on 29.3.2016 on medical grounds for a period of two months, with the directions to surrender before the Court after completion of medical treatment.

3. The case of the petitioner was fixed on 12.5.2016 and 19.5.2016 and he was marked absent on two consecutive dates. The bail facility allowed to the petitioner was recalled vide order dated 12.6.2016, which is impugned before this Court.

4. The learned counsel submitted at bar that the petitioner is chronic heart patient and has a long clinical history of his ailment, which is supported by the medical treatment and necessary documents are attached with the revision petition. Per learned counsel the petitioner is still under medical treatment at Karachi and the bail facility has wrongly been recalled by the learned Sessions Judge in a hasty manner.

5. The learned Dy. Attorney General opposed the petition and submitted that the petitioner has mis-used the concession of bail and did not surrender before the Court after completion of two months and the order of learned trial Court is well reasoned and justified.

6. I have gone through the order dated 29.3.2016 and of 21.6.2016. The accused was allowed two month's time on 29.3.2016 and his case was fixed for 12.5.2016 but he did not turn up. The case was fixed for 19.5.2016 but again he failed to appear before the Court and bail facility was re-called. To secure the ends of justice I suspend the order of learned Sessions Judge dated 21.6.2016. The petitioner/accused will surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of one month and he will be at liberty to move a fresh bail application before the learned trial Court if so advised.

7. The learned trial Court will dispose of the petition on merits without being influenced by any observation made in this order.

8. With the above observations the revision petition is disposed of. File.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch