Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2018 YLR 746

JAN MUHAMMAD vs The STATE

Citation2018 YLR 746
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Bail Application No, S-272 of 2017
Date2017-08-04
Judge(s)Aftab Ahmed Gorar
ResultBail granted

ORDER

AFTAB AHMED GORAR, J.--- Applicant/accused Jan Muhammad Salmankhail Pathan is confined in jail in Crime No,08/2017 registered at Police Station Naperkot, District Shikarpur, for offence under section 14(2) of Foreigners Act, 1946. He applied for grant of post-arrest bail, which was declined by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Shikarpur, vide order dated 23.05.2017, therefore, he has approached this Court with similar request.

2. According to the case of prosecution, on 01.3.2017, at about 4.00 p.m. the applicant/accused Jan Muhammad being citizen of Afghanistan was apprehended by a police party headed by HC Iltaf Ali Shah of P.S. Naperkot at Kandhkot-Shikarpur main road near Lanjo Larro without any valid and legal document of his availability in Pakistan, therefore, he was booked in the instant case.

3. Learned Counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant is Pakistani by birth being originally resident of South Waziristan and presently Village Khan Muhmmad Banglani, Taluka Khanpur, District Shikarpur and he has been falsely roped in the instant case by the police just to show their efficiency. It is further contended that the applicant has been doing business in District Shikarpur for the last 50/60 years and in support of such contentions birth certificate of applicant issued by Assistant Political Agent Wana South Waziristan has been placed on record. Learned Counsel further contends that the alleged offence carries punishment extendable upto five years, therefore, the same does not fall within prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. Lastly, learned Counsel submits that in the light of documentary proof produced by the applicant to be a Pakistani, the case against the applicant requires further enquiry. He further contended that the case has been challaned and the applicant is not required for further investigation.

4. The learned Assistant Attorney General produces with his statement report dated 01.8.2017 issued by Assistant Director (V&R) RHO NADRA, Sukkur and submits that the data of CNICs provided by the applicant/accused was verified and found to be true by the NADRA authorities,. however, according to him, still the applicant is under legal obligation to prove his identity of being Pakistani National. He, however, raises no objection for release of the applicant on bail.

5. It is an admitted position on record the applicant during interrogation disclosed the names of his family members to the police, which on verification by the NADRA Authorities have been found to be true, however, still the applicant has to prove his own identity of being a Pakistani National by producing some tangible material/evidence. The offence, with which he is charged, is punishable upto five years, which does not fall within prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. and the case has also been challaned, hence the applicant is not required for further investigation.

6. In the light of above facts and circumstances, the applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs,100,000/- (Rupees One Lae) and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch