Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLJ 2018 Cr.C. 632

ABDUL RAB vs STATE and another

CitationPLJ 2018 Cr.C. 632
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Crl, Misc, No, 138247-B of 2018
Date2018-05-14
Judge(s)Sardar Muhammad Shamim Khan
ResultBail allowed

ORDER

Abdul Rab petitioner seeks post arrest bail in a case registered against him vide FIR No 2182/2017 dated 15.11.2017 offence under Section 378, PPC at police station Factory Area, Lahore.

2. According to FIR, on 12.11.2017 at about 8/9:00 p.m Abdul Rab petitioner who was allegedly armed with dagger criminally trespassed into the house of the complainant and forcibly confined her brothers Taha and Talha in a room. It has been alleged in the FIR that petitioner forcibly" took Liebe Ali complainant in another room where he forced her to remove her clothes at dagger point, whereupon, she removed her clothes and petitioner committed sina.bil.jbar with her, In the meanwhile, her brother Talha made call at 15, therefore, police reached at the place of occurrence and petitioner was apprehended by the police at the spot. Hence instant FIR was registered.

3. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and learned DPP, it has been noticed that when police reached at the house of the complainant, Abdul Rab petitioner, Liebe Ali complainant/victim and her brother Talha were present in room which was bolted from outside, Police opened the door of said room and Met, Liebe, All complainant/victim was wearing clothes at that time whereas petitioner was apprehended by the police at the spot but dagger was not recovered from his possession at that time. The complainant/victim did not initiate the legal proceedings against the petitioner when he was apprehended by the police at the spot, therefore, petitioner was released by the police on the same day of occurrence. On 15.11.2017 about 3 days after the occurrence, Mst, Liaba All complainant lodged FIR against the petitioner wherein she levelled allegation of commission of sina-bil-Jabr with her against petitioner. On 14,11,2017 Met, Liaba All complainant was medically examined by the lady doctor and according to the opinion of lady doctor, her hymen was intact. No tears, laceration or abrasion was observed by the lady doctor on her (victim) private parts. The lady doctor also did not observe any mark of violence on the body of the victim, After the receipt of report of DNA test the lady doctor opined that rape was not committed but only attempt to rape was found, Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the allegation of commission of zina-bil-Jabr with the victim against the petitioner has not been proved. The petitioner was arrested in this case on 29.11.2017 and he is behind the bars for a period of about 51/2 months and is no more required by the police for the purpose of further investigation. No useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in Jail for an indefinite period.

4. For what has been discussed above, case of the petitioner comes within the ambit of further inquiry, therefore, this petition is accepted and petitioner is admitted to post arrest bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs, 2,00,000/. (Rupees two lace only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch