Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2017 MLD 222

RIAZ AKHTAR and anothers vs The STATE and another

Citation2017 MLD 222
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No,200-B of 2016
Date2016-03-01
Judge(s)Abdul Sami Khan
ResultBail granted

ORDER

' ABDUL SAMI KHAN, J.---Through this petition under section 497, Cr.P.C. Riaz Akhtar and Muhammad Hanif petitioners have sought bail after arrest in case FIR No,384/2015 dated 29.09.2015 under sections 302, 324, 148, 149, P.P.C., Police Station Saddar Wah, District Rawalpindi.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record with their able assistance. This is bail after arrest and only tentative assessment is required at this stage. The allegation against the petitioners as per FIR is that they along with their co-accused were following the deceased. Later on Riaz Akhtar petitioner along with Iftikhar alias Kharu and Qamar Zaman co- accused encircled the deceased, but there is no allegation of encircling the deceased against Muhammad Hanif petitioner. It has been noticed that no injury whatsoever is attributed to the petitioners on the persons of Tahir Mehmood deceased and Allama Zaheer alias Sadheer injured as the same has been attributed to George co-accused, therefore, the questions of sharing common intention. By the petitioners with their co-accused as well as their vicarious liability in the commission of alleged occurrence shall be determined by the learned trial court after recording evidence. In this regard, reliance can be placed on 1996 SCM R 1125. Admittedly, the petitioners are previous non-convict. They are behind the bars since 13.10.2015 without any fruitful progress in their trial. Investigation of the case is complete and the petitioners are no more required for further investigation. Mere heinousness of offence is no ground to refuse the concession of bail to the accused, who otherwise become entitled for that on the merits of case. No useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners behind the bars.

3. For what has been discussed above, the case of the petitioners becomes one of further inquiry covered.By subsection (2) of section 497 Cr.P.C. This petition is, therefore, allowed and the petitioners are granted bail subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs,100,000/- (Rupees one hundred thousand only) each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court.

4. The observations made hereinabove are tentative in nature and are strictly confined to the decision of this bail petition only.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch