Syed Shahbaz Ali Rizvi, J.--Through this criminal revision filed under Sections 435/439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 21.10.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffargarh, whereby, the application moved by the accused persons including the petitioner for supply of copies of statements of Abid Hussain and Muhammad Behram Khan, witnesses recorded by the Investigation Officer in case diaries No. 40 dated 24.03.2008 and 43 dated 09.04.2008, respectively, was dismissed.
2.Heard.
3. Keeping in view the established proposition of law that all the statements of witnesses recorded during investigation are recorded under Section 161 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 and as the statements of Abid Hussain and Muhammad Behram Khan, prosecution witnesses, dated 24.03.2008 and 09.04.2008 respectively, stand recorded under the same provision of law, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 2/complainant does not have any objection to the acceptance of the instant criminal revision provided a direction regarding swift conclusion of trial is given to the learned trial Court. Learned Prosecutor also does not have any objection to this effect in view of which the instant criminal revision stands allowed, the impugned order 21.10.2015 passed by the learned trial Court is set aside and the learned trial Court is directed to supply the copies of above mentioned statements to the accused persons/petitioner for the purpose warranted by law. Learned trial Court is also directed to proceed with the trial swiftly to ensure its expeditious conclusion within a period of three months after receipt of this order and for this purpose may proceed with the trial on day to day basis.