1. ' ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, J.---For causing an injury on the left eye of one Zafar Iqbal with an iron rod the appellant namely Muhammad Sarfraz had inter alia been convicted by the trial court for an offence under section 336, P.P.C. And the said conviction and sentence had subsequently been upheld by the High Court. Leave to appeal had been granted in this case in order to consider whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the provisions of section 336, P.P.C. Stood attracted to the allegation leveled against the appellant or not. With the assistance of the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Additional Prosecutor-General, Punjab appearing for the State we have gone through the record of the case with particular emphasis on the medical evidence available on the record and have found that through the statement of Dr. Muhammad Aslam (PW1), the Medico-legal Certificate issued by that doctor, the opinion rendered by a Medical Board as well as the opinion furnished by an Ophthalmologist it had been established that there was a partial loss of vision of the right eye of the victim namely Zafar Iqbal which partial loss of vision was to stay permanently and could not be cured even through a surgery. In view of availability of such medical evidence we have entertained no manner of doubt that the injury caused by the appellant to the victim did attract the provisions of section 335, P.P.C. And, thus, the conviction and sentence of the appellant recorded by the trial court for an offence under section 335, P.P.C. Read with section 336, P.P.C. Were not open to any legitimate exception. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed.