Pakistan Case Law← Search
2017 PLC (C.S.) 943

IRAM SHAHADI vs PRINCIPAL SCHOOL OF NURSING MAYO HOSPITAL, LAHORE

Citation2017 PLC (C.S.) 943
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.I.C.A. No,1342 of 2016
Date2017-02-02
Judge(s)Ayesha A. Malik, Jawad Hassan
ResultN/A

ORDER

' Through this ICA, the Appellant has impugned order dated 5.9.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No,27414/2016.

2. The facts of the case are that the Appellant after passing the matriculation exam applied for admission into General Nursing Training Course in the School of Nursing Mayo Hospital, Lahore. The Appellant joined the school on 7.1.2013. After completion of three years at the school, the Principal School of Nursing, Mayo Hospital, Lahore issued a provisional certificate with reference to the general nursing course attended. On 27.8.2016 the Appellant was issued a show cause notice alleging therein that she did not meet the merit for admission, hence her admission would be cancelled. She challenged the notice through W.P. No,27414/2016 before the learned Single Judge which was dismissed vide impugned order dated 5.9.2016. Learned counsel argued that after the issuance of show cause notice, a notice for personal hearing was issued on 6.9.2016 to the Appellant. Learned counsel stated that in compliance thereof the Appellant appeared before the Inquiry Committee yet the Principal of School of Nursing, Mayo Hospital, Lahore is threatening to terminate the admission of the Appellant.

3. The learned Law Officer raised the objection that it is just a show cause notice in which the Appellant was asked to submit her reply and relevant documents. Learned Law Officer further argued that the writ petition was not maintainable as a show cause notice was challenged in the said writ petition. He also stated that the Inquiry Committee has forwarded its recommendations to the competent authority who has yet to decide the matter.

4. Heard and record perused.

5. Admittedly the case of the Appellant was heard and recommendations have been forwarded to the competent authority. In the first instance the writ petition was not maintainable and we are in agreement with the findings of the learned Single Judge. At this stage

Cited by 7 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search