KARAM ELAHEE CHAUHAN, J.-Appeal of Mst Feroze Fatima is maintainable as of right as qua her the High Court judgment dated 8-7-1981 is of variance and the case involves questions regarding property over fifty thousand. See Article 185(2)(d) of the Constitution.
2. In the face of the aforesaid, the Petition for Special Leave to Appeal bearing No. 864 of 1981, filed by her husband Mirza Tasawar Ali Beg which is against the aforesaid (common) judgment of the High Court dated 8-7-1981 and pertains to the same property also deserves admission, to avoid any contradictory decision by this Court in these two cases which even otherwise involve important question of Law and fact. Consequently we grant leave to appeal. Security Rs. 2,000.
3. There was a prayer for stay of the execution and implementation of the High Court judgment and decree under appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent is already in possession of the property in dispute and he may continue retaining that possession and the petitioner will not make any interference therewith. Similarly he states that status quo may be allowed to him also vis-a-vis, the execution and implemen--tation of the High Court judgment and decree till the decision of these cases. The arrangement suggested seems to be quite fair and just inasmuch as it is not likely to prejudice any party, and will rather maintain the balance of convenience evenly between them. Order accordingly. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.