1. Through this petition, the petitioner has challenged the vires of order dated 04.11.2015 whereby on the application filed under Section 22-A & 22-B, Cr.P.C. by the Respondent No, 3 the learned Justice of Peace directed the SHO to register case against the petitioner.
2. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that, from the contents of the application filed by the Respondent No, 3 commission of cognizable offence was not made out yet the learned Justice of Peace illegally and wrongly passed the impugned order. He further contended that the petitioner lodged case F.I.R No, 211/2015 dated 29.05.2015 under Section 489-F, PPC Police Station Kot-Mithan, District Rajanpur and due to this revenge the complainant has tried to involve the petitioner and preform-respondents in false criminal case. Ike next contended that no M.LC was annexed by the Respondent No, 3 to prove his version that petitioner caused injury to him hence, impugned order is liable to be set-aside.
3. 3.On the other hand, learned A.A.G assisted by learned counsel for the Respondent No, 3 vehemently opposed this petition and supported the impugned order of the learned Justice of Peace.
4. 4.I have heard the learned-counsel for the parties and perused the record as well as impugned order passed by the learned Justice of Peace.
5. 5.I do not feel hesitation in endorsing the view taken by the learned Justice of Peace that copy of the cheque in question as well as dishonor slip is annexed with the file and Respondent No, 2 was directed to record the statement of the Respondent No, 3/petitioner and proceed strictly in accordance with law. I see no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order dated 04.11.2015, therefore,