Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLJ 2017 Cr.C. (Lahore) 501

AHMAD ALI vs STATE etc

CitationPLJ 2017 Cr.C. (Lahore) 501
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Crl. Appeal No. 1034 of 2016 & Cr1. Misc. No. 1 of 2016
Date2017-03-13
Judge(s)Aalia Neelum
ResultPetition accepted

ORDER

1. By means of instant petition, filed in term as of Section 426, Cr.P.C., Ahmad Ali, the petitioner seeks suspension of his sentence and admitting him to bail, pending disposal of his criminal appeal.

2. 2.Heard. Record perused.

3. 3.The learned trial Court in its judgment at Page No. 2, Paragraph No. 2, Line No. 9 reproduced the initial version of the prosecution, which reads as under: "While on resistance of Nazia Bibi accused Ahmad Ali and Zishan made fire shots which hit on her chest and she also died at the spot."

4. Whereas, at Page No. 4, testimony of the complainant-Manzoor Hussain (PW-2) was reproduced and in the Line No. 15, it was mentioned as following: "Zishan fired which hit at Nazia Bibi and she also fell down."

5. And at Page No. 5 of the judgment, in Line No. 9 of the testimony of Javed Mehmood (PW-3), it was mentioned as following: "Shan Ali shot fire which hit Nazia."

6. The learned trial Court while convicting the petitioner-Ahmad Ali had observed in its judgment at Pages No. 22 and 23, which reads as under: "As per discussion made above, it is clear that complainant has tried to introduce Nikkah between Ishrat Javed and Mst. Nazia Bibi but has not been able to prove the same, resulting into clear conclusion that Ishrat Javed being paramour of Mst. Nazia bibi was held with her in the same bed in her room, therefore, both were done to death with the fire-arm shots. Because both dead bodies were recovered from the said room in the house of accused Ahmad Ali, complainant and witness Javed have not been able to proved and justify their presence at the place of occurrence, therefore, their version being not attracted to a prudent mind is not acceptable whereas, the version of accused Ahmad Ali is corroborated by I.O. during investigation and through circumstantial evidence of matching of gun with the empties and the other circumstances as discussed above, therefore, the version of accused Ahmad Ali is acceptable being supported by circumstances."

7. 4.It is not disputed that the only evidence against the petitioner is of positive report and opinion of the Investigating Agency. The worth of said pieces of evidence would require serious consideration by this Court at the time of hearing of the main appeal.

8. 5.Accordingly instant petition is accepted, conviction and sentence of the petitioner-Ahmad Ali is suspended and the petitioner-appellant is admitted to bail till the final decision of appeal subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 5,00,000/-with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar (Judl.) of this Court. The petitioner-appellant shall, however, remain present in the Court on each and every date of hearing till the final decision of main appeal,

5. The office is directed to fix the titled appeal for 11.09.2017.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch