Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLJ 2016 Cr.C. (Lahore) 14

WAHEED ARSHAD vs STATE, etc.

CitationPLJ 2016 Cr.C. (Lahore) 14
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Crl. Misc. No. 3877-B of 2015
Date2015-07-07
Judge(s)Syed Shahbaz Ali Rizvi, Aslam Javed Minhas
ResultBail allowed

ORDER

' Through this petition, Waheed Arshad petitioner seeks his post arrest bail in a case beiring FIR No. 105/2015, dated 7.4.2015 under Section 365, PPC read with Section 7 of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, registered at Police Station Sheikh Faazil, District Vehari for abduction of Waqar Haider, maternal cousin of the complainant.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there is a delay of 33 hours in lodging the FIR and the petitioner was not named in the FIR and he has been involved through supplementary statement which was recorded by the police after 20 days of the alleged occurrence; that no identification parade was held in this case.

3. On the other hand learned Deputy Prosecutor General opposed the petition and argued that there is no mala fide or of the complainant or the police to falsely involve the petitioner in this case.

4. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

5. The record shows that the case was got registered after the delay of 33 hours without any plausible explanation. After 20 days of the registration of the case, the abductee himself appeared before the police and got recorded his statement in which he involved Muhammad Hussain, Muhammad Javaid and Muhammad Shahid co-accused for his abduction while the petitioner has been implicated by assigning the role of keeping him detained. No evidence except the oral assertion of PWs regarding the demand of ransom is available on record. The petitioner remained on physical remand with the investigation agency but no incriminating evidence against him could be brought on record. The petitioner who, as per prosecution case was not acquainted with the abductee has not been put to the test of identification parade during the investigation. In this view of the matter the case of the petitioner definitely requires further inquiry. After completion of investigation the petitioner has been sent to jail and no more required for investigation purpose. No useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars for an indefinite period.

This being so, the petition in hand is allowed and Waheed Arshad petitioner is admitted to post arrest bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 100,000/- (Rupees one hundred thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch