' Through this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of Notification No, 1007/Estt.
Dated 21.07.2014 issued by the Deputy Registrar (Admin) in respect of his repatriation to original Post & Scale in Islamia University of Bahawalpur.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that due to the impugned notification the salary of the petitioner was reduced and the petitioner is suffering for financial loss; that the notification was issued without hearing the petitioner and the act of Respondent Nb. 1 is against the "Principle of Locus Poinelentiae".
3. Heard. Record perused.
4. It is an admitted fact that the petitioner was appointed as Wrestling Coach (BPS-15) on short terms basis subject to condition of the computer training, failing which, the post of Supports Officer (BPS-16) will not be considered for confirmation but the petitioner has failed to get computer training and the respondents university had repatriated him to its original post of Wrestling Coach (BPS-15) in accordance with law alongwith additional assignment to secure him from financial loss.
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No, 3428 of 2014 with the prayer that the respondents may kindly be directed not to reduce the salary/scale of the petitioner from Scale No, 16 to 11, in which, this Court passed direction to the Vice-Chancellor, Islamia University of Bahawalpur to treat it as representation of the present petitioner and decide the same after hearing the petitioner all the concerned persons in accordance with law. In compliance of this Court order dated 13.05.2014, the Vice-Chancellor, Islamia University of Bahawalpur constituted a committee to resolve the eases of university including the petitioner's case. The committee decided in its meeting held on 01.07.2014 that the petitioner may be repatriated as Wrestling Coach (BPS-15) w,e,f, 30.06.2013 and he may be given additional charge for the post of Assistant Director, Physical Education (BPS-17) with allowance and according the Vice-Chancellor issued impugned notification of the repatriation of the petitioner and others employees of Islamia University Bahawalpur on 21.07.2014. Admittedly, the impugned notification was issued after hearing the petitioner in compliance of direction passed by this Court dated 13.05.2014 in Writ Petition No, 3428 of 2014. It is important to mention here that, the arrears of additional charge from 30.06.2013 to 31.07.2013 amounting to Rs, 68893/- were also granted to the petitioner vide Order No, 1007/Estt. Dated 21.07.2014 as mentioned in his service book.
The matter in dispute has already been resolved by the respondents university. The petitioner is not an aggrieved person to file the instant writ petition.
' Even otherwise, the petitioner under Rules 13 and 16 has a remedy of appeal or review and remedy of revision under Rule 17 of the Islamia University Employees Efficiency and Discipline Statutes, 1976 against the impugned order. It is settled law that when statutory remedy is available then writ petition is not maintainable. Reliance is placed on the cases reported as Tariq Mehmood A.Khan and Others vs. Sindh Bar Council and Another (2012 SCM R 702).
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any illegality or material irregularity in the impugned notification and has also not identified any jurisdictional defect.
6. In view of above, this writ petition is dismissed being misconceived and devoid of any merits.