1. ' MIAN SAQIB NISAR, J.---The suit for specific performance filed by the petitioners against the respondents was dismissed by the learned Trial Court. Such decree was challenged by the petitioners before the District Judge in appeal, which was accepted and the case was remanded vide order dated 25.2.2010, after which the suit was again dismissed. The petitioners did not file any appeal against such judgment and decree of dismissal, rather directly filed a revision petition before the learned High Court which (petition) has been discarded through the impugned judgment. In the revision before the learned High Court A primarily the order of remand dated 25.2.2010 was challenged which could not be assailed for the reason that it had attained finality and was not amenable to the revisional jurisdiction. As regards the challenge to the judgment dated 3.4.2010, suffice it to say that the petitioners had failed to avail the appropriate remedy of appeal and even if a revision had to be filed against the order of the learned Civil Judge as per the pecuniary jurisdiction it laid before the District Judge, therefore on this score too, the revision petition filed by the petitioners before learned High Court is absolutely incompetent. Though reliance has been placed on a number of judgments of this Court whereby an appeal has not been filed yet the learned High Court can exercise its jurisdiction against the challenged decree, suffice it to say that there can be no cavil with this proposition, but it has to be in an appropriate case, whereas we do not find this to be an appropriate case for the exercise of revisional/ supervisory jurisdiction by the learned High Court. No case for interference is made out. Dismissed accordingly.