Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2016 SCMR 2123

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ vs MUSTANSAR HUSSAIN and others

Citation2016 SCMR 2123
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Appeals Nos. 209-L and 210-L of 2009
Date2016-01-13
Judge(s)Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, Sardar Tariq Masood, Iqbal Hameed-ur-Rehman
ResultAppeal dismissed

' ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, J.---The facts of this case as well as the evidence produced before the trial court find an elaborate mention in the judgments passed by the courts below and, therefore, the same may not he reproduced here so as to avoid duplication and unnecessary repetition.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going the record we have observed that in order to prove its ease the prosecution had relied upon only two pieces of evidence and they were last-seen evidence and recovery of the deadbody. The alleged recovery of the deadbody was admittedly a joint recovery which is inadmissible in evidence. Apart from that the alleged recovery of the deadbody had not been effected at the pointing out of the private respondents because the deadbody had already been recovered much before the arrest of the said respondents. As regards the last-seen evidence all that the prosecution witnesses had said in that regard was that they had seen the private respondents going into the house of one Jameel Lodhi in the company of Farah Mushtaq deceased but it is not denied that the deadbody of the deceased had not been found in the house of Jameel Lodhi and the same had been found in the house of one Abdullah Arain. No witness had been produced before the trial court who had seen the private respondents entering the house of Abdullah Arain in the company of the deceased. In these circumstances the evidence produced by the prosecution as the last-seen evidence could not in the strict sense be called last-seen evidence. In the absence of any other evidence brought on the record to establish culpability of the private respondents the High Court had concluded that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against them beyond reasonable doubt. In the circumstances of the case mentioned above we have not been able to take any legitimate exception to the said conclusion reached by the High Court. These appeals are, therefore, dismissed. The bail bonds and sureties of the private respondents shall stand discharged.

Cited by 8 cases

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch