' Petitioner Muhammad Abid, seeks post-arrest bail in case FIR No. 609 dated 19.12.2014 u/S. 392, PPC, registered at Police Station Litton, Lahore.
2. Briefly, the prosecution case mentioned in the FIR is that two unknown persons committed robbery at the store of complainant and snatched Rs.15.000/- and five mobile phones. In the FIR, specific description has been given and complainant claimed that he can identify the said robbers.
3. Heard. Record perused.
4. While lodging FIR, complainant claimed that he can identify the robbers, but surprisingly, in this case no identification parade was arranged for. The learned Prosecutor is unable to explain as to why the identification parade was exempted, however, according to him petitioner was nominated subsequently on 08. 01. 2015 through a supplementary statement. While going through the said supplementary statement, it revealed that complainant did not describe the source through which he came to know about the involvement of petitioner. The record further reveals that petitioner made disclosure during investigation of case FIR No. 530 of 2014 and thereafter he was nominated by the complainant through supplementary statement. The disclosure in other case by itself is not sufficient to dis entitle him for the concession of bail. So far recovery of cash Rs. 10,000/- and mobile phone is concerned, the same will be appreciated by the trial Court after recording evidence, but presently, due to above-mentioned reasons, case of petitioner calls for further inquiry, falling under sub-section (2) of Section 497, Cr.P.C. The petitioner is behind the bars and his person is no more required by the police for the purpose of investigation.
5. Consequently, this petition is hereby allowed and petitioner is enlarged on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 200,000/- (Two Lac Rupees) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.