This civil revision is directed against the order dated 24-4-I974. . Passed by the learned District Judge, Multan under section 115 of the C. P. C.
2. Under the amended law, the High Court as well as the District Judge, both, have courrent jurisdiction and if the necessary order has been passed under section 115, C. P. C by the learned District Judge, revision petition against the said order would be incompetent.
3. It is contended by the learned counsel that the revision petition itself, before the learned District Judge, was incompetent and as such was liable to be dismissed. I am afraid, this contention cannot be allowed to be raised at this late stage, as the same was never raised before the learned District Judge, who disposed of the revision petition:
4. It is further contended that the amendment introduced by the Law Reforms Ordinance (No. XII) of 1972 in the Civil Procedure Code is ultra vires of the powers of the President, who could not do the same I am afraid, this contention also cannot be allowed to be raised as the same was never raised before the learned District Judge. Even otherwise I am not concerned with the other provisions of the Law Reforms Ordinance, except the amendment of section 115, C. P. C., under which the revision petition has been disposed of by the learned District Judge. Nothing has been shown as to how the present revision petition is competent after the order of the. Learned District Judge under the same provision of law has been passed.
The civil revision being incompetent is hereby. Dismissed in limine.