This Order will dispose of the proceedings initiated under Section 224(4) of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 ("Ordinance") by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan ("Commission") through Show Cause Notice No. S.M(B.0)C.O.222/H28(4)14 dated 24/04/2014 ("Notice") issued to Mr. Saleem Butt ("Respondent"), Director of Hascol Petroleum Limited ("Issuer Company").
2. The facts of the matter leading up to aforesaid Notice are that the Issuer Company is a public listed company and the Respondent being its Director was required to file returns of beneficial ownership on Form 31 and Form 32 within the period stipulated under Section 222 of the Ordinance.
However, he failed to discharge the said obligation which attracts penal provision contained in Section 224(4) of the Ordinance.
3. Section 222(2)(b) and Section 222(2)(c) of the Ordinance stipulate the period within which the Fond 31 and Form 32 respectively are required to be submitted as under:- 222(2)(b) "in any other case, including a case where the company is listed on the stock exchange after the commencement of this Ordinance or after the person has occupied the position or office specified in sub-section (1) or has acquired interest as beneficial owner of securities as aforesaid, within thirty days of occupying the office in the company or acquisition of interest as beneficial owner requiring submission of the return aforesaid or listing of the company on the stock exchange, as the case may be"; 222(2) (c) "where there is any change in the position or interest as aforesaid including a change in the beneficial ownership of any equity, security, within fifteen days of such change".
4. The Respondent in response to this office letter dated 29/12/2014 filed Form 31 and Form 32 with this Commission on 13/01/2015. The said Form. 31 inter alia showed that the Issuer Company was formally listed at Karachi Stock Exchange on 14/05/2014. Thus the Respondent was required to file the said return with this Commission within 30 day Issuer Company i.e. latest by 13/06/2014, but the same has been filed on 13/01/2015, with delay of 213 days, in contravention of Section 222(2)(b) of the Ordinance.
5. While, the Form 32 showed that 83,000 shares were sold by Respondent on 10/11/2014.
Thus, he was required to file Form 32 in this regard latest by 25/11/2014, but, the same has been filed on 13/01/2015 with delay of 48 days, in contravention of Section 222(2)(c) of the Ordinance.
6. The aforesaid contraventions prima facie attract penal provision of Section 224(4) of the Ordinance, which provides as under:- "Whoever knowingly and wilfully contravenes or otherwise fails to comply with any provision of section 222, section 223 or section 224 shall be liable to a fine which may extend to thirty thousand rupees and in the case of a continuing contravention, non-compliance or default to a further fine which may extend to one thousand rupees for every day after the first during which such contravention, non-compliance or default continues."
7. The Commission took cognizance of the aforesaid default and issued Notice to the Respondent under Section 224(4) of the Ordinance, calling upon him to explain through written reply alongwith documentary evidence, if any as to why action may not be taken against him pursuant to Section 224(4) of the Ordinance, for aforesaid contravention of Section 222 of the Ordinance. Furthermore, personal hearing in the matter was also fixed on 08/051/2015 at Commission's Head Office, Islamabad.
8. Mr. Mumtaz Hassan Khan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company responded the Notice on behalf of the Respondent vide letter dated 05/05/2015 and communicated that the matter may be decided by considering the written submissions , which be summarized as under:- a) The Respondent was Director of the Company prior to initiating the process of listing of the company at stock exchange and this fact was disclosed in prospectus of the Issuer Company. b) Filing of returns of beneficial ownership after listing of the Company was inadvertently missed out. c) The omission was inadvertent and has not been committed willfully. d) Upon receipt of Commission's letter, the Respondent compiled and filed the returns and also provided reasons for inadvertent omission of such filing e) The Respondent assured timely compliance in future and requested to drop the proceedings
9. Prior to conclude the findings, it seems necessitated to mention that subsequent to receipt of aforementioned reply, the Parliament of Islamic Republic of Pakistan approved new enactment titled as Securities Act 2015 and this act of the Parliament received assent of the President of Pakistan on May 13, 2015. With the promulgation of the Securities Act 2015, Section 220 to 224 of the Ordinance stand omitted/repealed. Since all proceedings were completed prior to promulgation of the Securities Act 2015, therefore, the matter is being disposed of pursuant to omitted provisions of Section 224(4) of the Companies Ordinance, 1984.
10. I have considered the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the Respondent. The Respondent has stated that he has been working as Director of the Issuer Company before its listing at the stock exchange. The Respondent has admitted the default with the contention that the same was not committed willfully and knowingly. I have reviewed the record of this office and observed that the Company was formally listed inter alia at Karachi Stock Exchange on 14/05/2014.
After listing of the Issuer Company, the Respondent has sold 83,000 shares, which have been reported with delay of 48 days. The record further showed that the Respondent has also filed the said returns with respective Company Registration Office. The Respondent, being a Director of a newly listed company as well as considering the submissions made by him, I intend to agree with the contention of the Respondent and of the view that late filing of said return may not be willful.
Therefore, a lenient view of the matter has been taken and the Respondent is hereby strictly warned to ensure timely compliance of Section 222 of the Ordinance in future.
11. This Order is issued without prejudice to any other action that the Commission/Registrar may initiate against the Respondent in accordance with the law on matter subsequently investigated or brought to the Notice of the Commission.