1. ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.-The dispute between the parties relates to allotment of land measuring 6 kanals in Khasra Nos. 1491/1-2 and 149/1. After series of litigation in the department, the dispute came up before the former High Court of West Pakistan in Writ Petition No. 532-R of 1963 filed by Hakeemuddin, predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners. The petition was dismissed with the result that the confirmation of land in favour of Lal Din respondent was upheld. After having been unsuccessful in the High Court, petitioners moved an application before the Rehabilitation Commis--sioner for the review of the order dated 3-7-1961 which had earlier been challenged by them in Writ Petition No. 352-R of 1963. Learned Rehabilitation Commissioner dismissed the review application by the order dated 12-9-1969 on the ground that the petitioners had earlier unsuccessfully challenged the same order in their second revision and also in the Writ Petition in the High Court, and, even otherwise, no ground for review was made out.
2. Petitioners did not rest at that, but again filed miscellaneous applications under sections 10 and 11 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 and also under section 20
(3) of the Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958. After these proved to be futile they approached the High Court once again, in Writ Petition No. 168-R of 1970. The petition was dismissed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court by the judgment dated 4-10-1.973 and -then filed this petition seeking special leave to appeal.
3. It would be seen from the facts narrated above that litigation between the parties was foreclosed by the judgment of the former High Court of West Pakistan in Writ Petition No. 352-R of 1963. The litigation that ensued thereafter at petitioner's instance was bare repetition of their pleas in support of their entitlement which had been rejected earlier, and on these facts, theHigh Court rightly declined to interfere with the orders sought to be challenged by the petitioners.
4. This petition has no meritand is dismissed in limine.