1. FAZLE-AKBAR, J.-The dispute in this case is with respect to House No. B-I-S-3-8, Mandi Chuharkana, District Sheikhupura.
2. On 10-10-54, this house was transferred to Khadija Begum on her C. H. Form. Later, by mistake, this house was included in the earmarking list and thereafter it was drawn by lots in the name of the petitioner Atta Muhammad on 25-5-60 and a P. T. O. Was issued in his favour on 31-10-60. When the said fact was brought to the notice of the Deputy Settlement Commis--sioner, he, while canceling the lot drawn in favour of Atta Muhammad, directed that the latter should be allowed "choice to earmark some other house in the list of auction" and his order was upheld in appeal and on revision. The High Court also declined to interfere with the order of the Settlement authorities in its writ jurisdiction.
3. The learned counsel has found it difficult to challenge the legality and propriety of the order of the Settlement authorities. It will suffice to say that as the property had already been transferred to Mst.
4. Khadija Begum the same should not have been put in the earmarking list. The High Court has, therefore, rightly declined to interfere with the order of the Settlement Department.
5. This petition is accordingly dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.