1. This second appeal arises out of a pre-emotion suit. The land transferred under the impugned sale fell in the ownership of respondents. The appellant who was the pre-emptor was found to be in enjoyment of superior right only in respect of one Khata. His claim for the possession of the other Khata was rejected. The .Appellant contends that he was a tenant in the land comprised in the other Khata and as such with regard to A the last too he had superior right. This contention is without any merit for the impugned .Sale. Was completed prior. To the enforcement of the Martial Law Regulation No. 115, which for the -first time conferred a right of pre-emotion on the tenants. No other, point. Was raised in this appeal which is hereby dismissed in limine.