' IBAD-UR-REHMAN LODHI, J.---The petitioner got admission in the respondent- University in MBA (I)
(Morning) for the Session 2008-2010 and on completion of his course in 2010, he was awarded result card, showing that he obtained 2.99 Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA). After expiry of three years, this petition was filed by the petitioner, complaining some discrimination on the allegation that in the previous courses of MBA and also subsequent courses of MBA 3.00/4.00 CGPA was considered as equivalent to 65% whereas for the session of 2008-2010 in which the petitioner got admission, the grading system for calculation of CGPA was revised and 3.00/4.00 as CGPA was rendered equivalent to 70% marks.
2. The petitioner when got admission, he was-fully aware of such grading system and accepted his such admission in session 2008-2010 and then on completion of his course in 2010 accepted the result without raising any objection or reservation. It does not lie in the mouth of the petitioner to plead discrimination, for, the discrimination can always be pladed in between similarly placed persons. In the session of MBA for the year 2008-2010, no one has been given any extra benefit from prevailing grading system and it was the previous session and the subsequent session for which the rules were revised to the effect that 65% marks were considered equivalent to 3.00/4.00 CGPA, thus the plea of discrimination is not available to the petitioner. No substantive right of the petitioner has been infringed and the petitioner has failed to point out any jurisdictional defect in the impugned proceedings, the petition thus is not sustainable and is dismissed.