' SH. AZMAT SAEED, J.---This Petition for Leave to Appeal is directed against the Impugned Judgment dated 27.1.2012 of the learned Peshawar High Court, D.I. Khan Bench, whereby Civil Revision No, 91 of 2007 filed by Petitioners was dismissed.
2. The brief facts necessary for adjudication of the /is at hand are that Respondent No, 1 filed a suit for permanent injunction and possession in respect of the property in dispute measuring 23 kanals and 10 marlas. The suit was resisted. On the divergent pleadings of the parties, issues were framed and the evidence, was led, where after the learned Trial Court seized of the matter decreed the suit vide Judgment and Decree dated 264.2004.. Aggrieved, the Petitioners filed an appeal, which was dismissed by the learned Appellate Court vide appellate Judgment and Decree dated 22.12.2006, where after the Petitioners invoked the revisional jurisdiction of the learned Peshawar High Court through Civil Revision No, 91 of 2007, which has been dismissed vide Impugned Judgment dated 27.1.2012.
3. The learned counsel for the Petitioners has been heard and the available record perused.
4. The learned Trial Court on the basis of the evidence on record, including the statement of the Patwari and the report of the Naib Tehsildar, which was appointed as Local Commission, returned the findings, that the Petitioners had encroached upon 23 Kanals and 10 marlas of land of respondent No, 1/plaintiff and decreed the suit The said finding has been affirmed in appeal. The revision filed by the petitioners has also been dismissed. There is a concurrent finding of fact, which has been affirmed by the learned High Court. The learned counsel is seeking reappraisal of evidence, which if not permissible at this stage. He is unable to point out any illegality in the Impugned Judgment, warranting interference by this Court.
5. Consequently, this Petition being without merit is dismissed and leave declined.
High Court Judgment Upheld/.