1. NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.-Heard. The appeal of the petitioner was dismissed by our judgment dated 8-7-1981 because he having become a fugi--tive from law was not found entitled to any relief as held in our judgment in Hayat v. State PLD 1981 SC 265. Review is sought on the ground that the petitioner is entitled to the same benefit as extended to his co-convicts in the impugned judgment.
2. As held in the `case of Hayat Bakhsh the petitioner having remainedfugitive from law is not entitled to seek any relief even by review.
3. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed. He may, if so advised, seek relief from the executive authorities.