' AALIA NEELUM, J. --- Through the instant petition, the petitioner has challenged the vires of order dated 19.7.2013 passed by the learned Ex-Officio Justice of Peace whereby respondent No, 2 was directed to appear before the SHO concerned who shall proceed further strictly in accordance with law.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according to the subsequent report dated 8.2.2013 submitted by the SHO, Police Station Islampura, Lahore, the cheques issued by the petitioner pertaining to Habib Bank Ltd., Shahalam Branch, Lahore and the said branch falls within the jurisdiction of Police Station, Rang Mahal, Lahore and as such Police Station Islampura, Lahore has got no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the matter. Further submits that the contents of application filed by respondent No, 2 before the learned Justice of Peace no cognizable offence is made out but the learned Justice of Peace has erred in law while issuing direction to the S.H.O.
Concerned to chalk out F.I.R. Against the culprits while invoking Section 154, Cr.P.C. And respondent No, 2 was directed to appear before the SHO concerned for implementation of order and as such the impugned order has created great miscarriage of justice. Learned counsel submits that respondent No, 2 has obtained the impugned order by concealing the material facts.
3. I have given patient hearing to the learned counsel for the parties and also gone through the contents of the application filed by respondent No, 2 before the learned Justice of Peace and the impugned order dated 19.7.2013 passed thereon and observed that the learned Justice of Peace has done nothing beyond his jurisdiction. The subsequent report dated 8.2.2013 submitted by the SHO, Police Station Islampura, Lahore shows that the cheques issued by the petitioner pertaining to Habib Bank Ltd., Shahalam Branch, Lahore and the said branch falls within the jurisdiction of Police Station Rang Mahal, Lahore whereas the order, impugned herein, depicts as under:- ' "Keeping in view the prayer of the petitioner, documents annexed with the petition; apparently cognizable offence is made out, therefore, the SHO concerned is hereby ordered to chalk out F.I.R.
Against the culprits while invoking Section 154, Cr.P.C. The petitioner shall himself appear before the SHO concerned for the implementation of order. "
' The order, impugned herein, clearly shows that "SHO concerned" was directed to chalk out F.I.R.
Against the culprits while invoking Section 154, Cr.P.C. And no particular Police Station was mentioned in the impugned order. In my view the impugned order is eminently reasonable and proceeds on cogent grounds. The learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to point out any infirmity legal or factual in the impugned order which would justify interference.
4. For the foregoing reasons this petition is disposed of with the above observations.