' ALI BAQAR NAJAFI, J. --- Muhammad Asif petitioner seeks post arrest bail in case FIR No,. 233/2013, dated 2.5.2013, offence under Sections 367-A, 376-I, 377 and 511, PPC registered with Police Station, Satellite Town, Jhang.
2. The prosecution version as set forth in the FIR is that on 2.5.2013 at about 11.00 a.m, the complainant's daughter namely Mst. No,or Fatima aged 41/2 years was playing in the street in front of his house. The petitioner while enticing her took her to his house and committed illicit intercourse with her. On hue and cry of the victim, the complainant alongwith PWs, reached the scene and found the accused committing illicit intercourse with the victim by removing her Shalwar and shutting her mouth with hand. On seeing the complainant and the PWs the accused fled away from the spot by extending them life threats. The victim was found smeared in blood.
3. After registration of the said case, the petitioner applied for the grant of post arrest bail before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Jhang, which was dismissed vide order dated 24.6.2014. Hence this petition.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely entangled in the above-said case; that there is contradiction between oral and medical evidence and medical certificate does not corroborate the prosecution story; that there is delay of five days in conducting the medical examination of the victim and there is delay of seven days in lodging the FIR, which makes the prosecution story doubtful; that reason for false implication of the petitioner is that a case lodged by uncle of the petitioner who was witness in the said FIR. The accused of that case Ghulam Mustafa was brother-in-law of the complainant, whereby he was convicted for seven years and because of that grudge the instant case has been registered against the petitioner.
5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the complainant assisted by learned APG submits that case was registered on 2.5.2013 and the accused/petitioner was arrested on 4.5.2013; that there is no delay in lodging the FIR; that age of victim No,or Fatima is 41/2 years, while the age of accused/petitioner is 23 years and there are no chances of false implication of the petitioner in the above said case; that prosecution version set forth in the FIR is fully corroborated with medical evidence; that there is no malice or ill will on the part of complainant or prosecution to falsely implicate the petitioner in a shameful offence; that medical evidence brought on the record during the investigation, connects the petitioner with the commission of offence; Lastly, he prays for dismissal of this petition.
6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance.
7. The petitioner is specifically nominated in the FIR with specific allegation of committing rape with a child of 41/2 years. The ocular account is comprising of the eyewitnesses and also the statement of the victim, which is corroborated with the medical evidence. The FIR is promptly lodged. No, case for post arrest bail is made out. This petition having no merits is hereby dismissed. Bail after arrest refused.