' ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, J.---Through this petition Malik Muhammad Aslam petitioner has sought leave to appeal against the order dated 26-12-2012 passed by a learned Judge-in-Chamber of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 17387-B of 2012 whereby pre-arrest bail was refused to him in case F.I.R. No. 495 registered at Police Station Lundianwala, District Faisalabad on 19-10-2012 in respect of offences under sections 337F(iii)/337-L(2)/34, P.P.C. During the investigation section 337-A(i), P.P.C. Had been added to the F.I.R.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the record with their assistance we have observed that according to the F.I.R. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had given a blow from the wrong side of his hatchet to Muhammad Mushtaq complainant which blow had landed on the little finger of his right hand attracting the provisions of section 337- F(iii), P.P.C. An offence under section 337-F(iii), P.P.C. Carries a maximum sentence of three years' imprisonment. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner tlree co-accused of the petitioner have already been admitted to pre-arrest bail in this case and the said co-accused had given some simple injuries to the complainant on different parts of his body. The investigating officer has confirmed the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation but he has maintained that a hatchet is yet to be recovered from the petitioner's custody and, thus, the petitioner's physical custody is required by him for the said purpose. In this connection we have noticed that the occurrence in this case had taken place on 16-10-2012, i.e. Exactly three months ago, during which period any blood available on the petitioner's hatchet must have disintegrated leaving the proposed recovery to be of little legal consequence. In this view of the matter we have not felt persuaded to deprive the petitioner of his liberty merely to facilitate the investigating officer to go through a formality which formality is not likely to serve any beneficial purpose for the prosecution. In this backdrop the intended , arrest of the petitioner by the local police has not been found by us to be above board.
3. For what has been discussed above this petition is converted into an appeal and the same is allowed and, consequently, Malik Muhammad Aslam petitioner is admitted to pre-arrest bail subject to furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court within a period of two weeks from today.