Pakistan Case Law← Search
1982 SCMR 1142

A. M. QURESHI vs UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC AND Another

Citation1982 SCMR 1142
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Appeal No. K-25 of 1970 Suit No. 115 of 1966
Date1981-02-21
Judge(s)Fakhruddin G. Ibrahim, Sheikh Anwarul Haq, Muhammad Haleem, Shafi-ur-
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

1. ANWARUL HAQ, C. J: This old appeal was specially fixed for today after consultation with the learned Advocates-on-Record .For both the parties but unfortunately no counsel or Advocate-on- Record has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents, and instead Mr. Z. D. Magerramov has appeared and made a request for adjournment so as to seek further instructions from his Ambassador and his Government and to engage a counsel.

2. Mr. Sharifuddin Pirzada, appearing for the appellant, has opposed the request for the adjournment on the ground that this appeal has been pending in this Court for more than 10 years, and proper and timely intimation of today's hearing had been given to both the parties. He submits that the appellant has incurred considerable expense in bringing his counsel and his Assistants to Lahore for this purpose.

3. Ordinarily we would have been disinclined to grant an adjournment in this case, as it is one of the oldest appeals pending in this Court, and today's hearing had been fixed after due consultation with all concerned. I appears, however, that Mr. M. I. Memon, who was acting as the Advocate --on- Record for the respondents, and has since been appointed as Additional Advocate-General of the Sind Province, did not take the necessary steps to ensure proper representation on behalf of the respondents. As an important question of law regarding the jurisdiction of the Pakistan Courts over a foreign Government is involved, we consider that it would be in the fitness of things if a reasonable adjournment is allowed so as enable the res--pondents to arrange proper representation before this Court.

4. The matter is, accordingly, adjourned to the 14th of March, 1981, so as to be heard at Rawalpindi.

5. It has been made clear to Mr. Z. D. Magerramov, Assistant to the U.S.S.R. Trade Representative in Pakistan that no further adjournment shall be allowed, and in the absence of representation, the matter shall proceed ex parte against the respondents.

6. As the appellant has incurred considerable expense in bringing his counsel to Lahore, the respondents shall pay costs in the sum of Rs. 10,000 for this adjournment.

7. A copy of this order shall be transmitted immediately to the U.S.S.R. Embassy in Islamabad, as well as to the U.S.S.R. Trade Representative in Karachi. A copy shall also be sent to Mr. M. I. Memon to explain the reasons for his failure to arrange proper representation for the respondents in this case in spite of having received timely intimation about to day's hearing.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search