Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2014 MLD 745

FAKHR-E-ALAM vs The STATE

Citation2014 MLD 745
CourtPeshawar High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No,429-P of 2013
Date2013-04-17
Judge(s)Shah Jehan Khan Akhundzada
ResultBail granted

' SHAH JEHAN AKHUNDZADA, J.---Accused-petitioner, Fakhr-e-Alam has approached this Court for his release on bail in case F.I.R. No,492 dated 18-7-2012 under section 9(c) Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, on the ground that the trial Court has not concluded his trial within a month, as ordered by. This Court in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No, 1243 of 2012, dated 9-10- 2012.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as counsel for the State and perused the record.

3. Previously, the accused-petitioner has filed bail petition Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No,1243 of 2012) before this Court which was dismissed vide order dated 9-10-2012 being not pressed and the trial Court was directed to conclude the trial within a month positively after the receipt of the case under intimation to the Additional Registrar (Judi.) of this Court.

4. Perusal of the record shows that complete challan was submitted before the trial Court on 5-12- 2012. Provision of section 265-C, Cr.P.C. Were complied with on 11-1-2013. The accused-petitioner as well as his co-accused were formally charged by the trial Court on 26-1-2013 and the case was adjourned to 9-2-2013 for recording statements of the prosecution witnesses. From 9-2-2013 till 18- 4-2013 the case was adjourned due to absence of the prosecution witnesses. It transpires from the order sheets of the trial Court file that the case was lingering on due to absence of prosecution witnesses and the accused-petitioner is not at fault for unnecessary adjournments. The trial Court has not complied the order of this Court dated 9-10-2012, therefore, this Court is constrained to allow bail to the accused-petitioner.

5. Resultantly, this bail application is accepted and the accused-petitioner is admitted to bail provided he furnishes bail bond in the sum of Rs,100,000 (rupees one lac) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court, who shall ensure that the sureties must be local, reliable and men of means.

6. Above are the reasons of my short order announced on 17-4-2013.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch