Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2014 MLD 672

ABID SHAH vs The STATE and another

Citation2014 MLD 672
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No,6346-B of 2013
Date2013-06-11
Judge(s)Mazhar Iqbal Sidhu
ResultBail refused

ORDER

' MAZHAR IQBAL SIDHU, J.---Abid Shah petitioner after having been imprisoned, through the instant petition has sought for post arrest bail in a case registered against him vide No, 148 dated 2-5-2013 under section 162, P.P.C. At Police Station, Shahkot, District Nankana Sahib on the written complaint of Muhammad Riaz on the allegation that he took illegal gratification from the complainant in order to influence Mr. Khawar Rafique, Illaqa Magistrate, Police Station Sadar Shahkot, District Nankana Sahib to get a case decided in favour of the complainant.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there is a delay of eight days in reporting the matter to the police; prima fade from the bare perusal of the F.I.R., offence under section 162, P.P.C.

Is not constituted against the petitioner; the complainant has sworn his affidavit in favour of the petitioner and the offence alleged does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C, therefore, he may be granted bail.

3. Learned D.P.G. Has opposed the submissions and has argued that it is very unfortunate on the part of the petitioner that as being a relative of a judicial officer, has been deceiving and depriving the people, therefore, such like persons should not be extended discretionary relief notwithstanding the offence alleged falls outside the pale of prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C.

4. Arguments heard. Record seen.

5. The petitioner is nominated in the F.I.R. His role is obnoxious, sordid, spiteful, unpalatable, cardinal-sin and depreciative. He seems to be intractable, invidious, notoriety to the judiciary and does not deserve relief of bail as in the recent past about nineteen days earlier he A has been sent to jail nevertheless the offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C.

Hence, the petition is dismissed.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch