Pakistan Case Law← Search
2013 PTD 1400

SME BANK LTD. vs CHAIRMAN APPELLATE AUTHORITY and another

Citation2013 PTD 1400
CourtIslamabad High Court
Case No.Writ Petition No,314 of 2012
Date2012-02-06
Judge(s)Muhammad Anwar Khan Kasi
ResultPetition dismissed in limine

ORDER

1. ' MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN KASI, J.---The petitioner has challenged the orders dated 28-1-2010 and 11-10-2011, passed by the Adjudicating and Appellate authorities of the Employees Old-Age Benefits Institution, whereby its stand for exemption from the applicability of EOB Act, 1976 was rejected and was asked to be registered under the Employees Old-Age Benefit Act, 1976 and to pay contribution for its employees. In consequence of these orders, petitioner was directed to pay Rs,11,50.,2000 as contribution towards EOBI vide demand notice dated 19-1-2012 within fifteen days.

2. ' It is contended that SME Bank is a statutory body created by Regional Development Finance Corporation and Small Business Finance Corporation (Amalgamation and Conversion) Ordinance, 2001 and managed, controlled and financed by the Government of Pakistan through Ministry of Finance and its regular employees are insured and the Bank has its own pension and gratuity schemes, therefore, the petitioner is covered by clause (f) of 47 of the Employees Old-Age Benefit Act, 1976 and, therefore, the Bank is not under legal obligation to make any contribution towards EOBI.

3. ' It is reiterated that petitioner is a statutory body and is out of the ambit of the said Act, while Adjudicating as well as the Appellate Authority under the said Act failed to appreciate law and facts of the case.

4. ' It is finally contended that amendment in Finance Act No,1 of 2008 is not applicable to them, because they are covered by section 47 of the Act 1976.

5. Writ Petition No, 1594-2011, Samina Farzain versus Ministry of Information through Secretary and another ' Heard and record perused.

6. There is no ambiguity about the interpretation of the amendment made through Finance Act No,1 of 2008, which has made the Act applicable to all the Banks, Banking Companies and Financial Institutions w,e,f, 1-7-2008 as clause (e) of section 47 of EOB Act, 1976 was omitted. The petitioner has been registered and is operating in the name of a Bank, therefore, cannot get the status of a statutory body to be out of tLe ambit of EOB Act, 1976. The banks and financial institutions are no exempted from EOB Act. The stand taken by the petitioner as being a statutory body, is liquefied through S.R.0, No, 898(1)/2001, dated 29-12-2001, whereby the petitioner has been referred as a Company, The status of the petitioner is no more than a Public Limited Company operating as a Bank and, therefore, the EOB Act, 1976 is fully applicable and petitioner is required to abide by the terms and conditions of the Act, 1976 by making a contribution towards OBI.

7. ' In view of above, I see no reason to interfere in the impugned orders passed by respondents and the petition being forceless is dismissed in limine. in limine.

For educational and research use only β€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerΒ·PrivacyΒ·TermsΒ·Search