Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1981 PLC 838

SECURITY PAPERS LTD., KARACHI vs REHMAT AL!

Citation1981 PLC 838
CourtLabour Appellate Tribunal
Case No.Application No. KAR-382 of 1980,
Date1980-08-06
Judge(s)Z. A. Channa
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

' This is an application praying for the transfer of the Application Na, 20/80, under section 25-A, I. R.

0., presently pending adjudication before the learned IVth Labour Court on the grounds, firstly, that the learned Labour Court had disallowed certain questions which the learned counsel for the applicant was desirous of putting to a witness in cross-examination, and secondly, the learned Labour Court, while hearing the arguments of the learned counsel of the applicants had made the unwarranted observation that it would only accept the rulings of the High Court and not of this Tribunal and from these 2 circumstances, the applicants apprehend that it may not get a fair deal and justice from the learned Labour Court. The remarks of the learned Presiding Officer of the IVth Labour Court have been called for. He has denied both these allegations. According to him no questions put by the learned counsel of the applicants were disallowed. He has further stated that there was no reason for him to state that he would not accept the rulings of this Tribunal since he has, in his, decisions, repeatedly relied upon them. In fairness to the learned Presiding Officer, I must f_lay that in a number of his decisions which have come to my notice, he has referred to and relied upon the decisions of this Tribunal.

2. The respondent also had filed objection to the transfer application .4 denying the above allegations. Now as regards the first ground on which the transfer of the case is sought, even if it be conceded that the learned Labour Court disallowed certain questions, this itself would not be sufficient ground for the transfer of proceedings, since it is within the power of the learned Labour Court to disallow questions which he thinks inadmissible and irrelevant. Since the nature of the questions which are said to have been disallowed is not known, it is not possible to say that the disallowing of the said question was a wrong exercise of the discretion vested in the Court. So far as the second allegation is concerned, since this Tribunal is the appellate authority in respect of all the Labour Courts in the Province, it is incumbent upon them to follow and accept its decisions. As already pointed out, in a number of decisions of the learned Labour Court which have come to my notice he has relied upon the decisions of this Tribunal.

3. I am, therefore, of the view that no valid ground for transfer of the case has been made out.

However, I would like to emphasise that the Courts are required to show due consideration to the counsel of the parties, specially senior counsel tend nothing should be done or expressed " which could remotely suggest in the minds of the parties or their counsel that the Court is prejudiced.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch