Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2013 P Cr. L J 1754

GHULAM MUSTAFA vs The STATE and anothers

Citation2013 P Cr. L J 1754
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No,1648-B of 2012
Date2012-08-16
Judge(s)Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi
ResultBail allowed

ORDER

' ALTAF IBRAHIM QURESHI, J.---Petitioner Ghulam Mustafa through the instant petition seeks post arrest bail in case F.I.R. No,505 registered under sections 324, 337-F(iii), 148, 149, P.P.C. With Police Station Harappa, District Sahiwal, on 21-10-2011.

2. Precisely the allegation against the petitioner, as per F.I.R., is that on 19-10-2011 at about 3-00 p.m., he along with his co-accused respective weapons, attempted to commit qatl-e-amd of the complainant and as a result of which he sustained injury.

3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, I find that the instant case has been registered with the delay of two days. Allegedly the petitioner has caused injury to the complainant on his right thigh. The said alleged injury is on non-vital part of the body and has not been declared to be dangerous to life. The said injury attracts the provision of section 337-F(iii), which is punishable for three years, and does not fall within the prohibitory, clause of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. Further there is no repetition of fire shot on his part. In such circumstances of the case, the question that if he ultimately can be held liable for the offence under section 324, P.P.C. Or that of his vicarious liability in the matter is to be gone into at trial. Hence, from such an angle, his case is open to further inquiry into his guilt and so, is cover under subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C.

4. The petitioner is behind the bars since 26-3-2012 without any progress in the trial. So, the petitioner cannot be kept in jail for an indefinite period which, even otherwise, would not serve any useful purpose to the prosecution.

5. For what has been discussed above, I accept this petition and B allow bail to the petitioner subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs,2,00,000 (Rupees two lac only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch